1,231 homes across Alberta were long-term tested for radon in the two federal surveys. Every one is a dot on this map, coloured by what it read, with the number of tested homes printed beside every district figure.
Every dot is one tested house. Zoom in for street names. Shaded districts had no home tested in either survey.
under 100100 to 147148 to 199200 and aboveno homes tested
1,231 measurements shown, and 27 more with no district recorded that cannot be placed. Dot positions inside a district are illustrative, not addresses. The survey records which district a home was in, never where it stood. Tap any dot for its reading, or any district for its count and median. Rural districts here cover thousands of square kilometres, so a dot in one says very little about any particular corner of it.
Outside the two big cities Alberta reads lower, not higher. Of the 1,007 measurements from the rest of the province, 7.3% are at or above the action level with a median of 76, against Calgary at 14.4% and a median of 101, and Edmonton at 6.7%. So the value of this page is not that rural Alberta is worse. It is that until now there was nowhere to look most of it up at all. The highest rural district with a real sample is T0M, the Didsbury and Olds area, at a median of 124 across 18 homes.
Canada acts at 200 Bq/m³. The United States EPA acts at about 148. The World Health Organization sets a reference level of 100. Applied to the same 1,231 homes:
Same houses, same measurements. Why the three numbers differ, and which one to use.
| District | Land km² | Homes tested | Median | Highest | At or over 200 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0M | 21,253 | 18 | 124 | 570 | 5 |
| T4V | 158 | 15 | 118 | 246 | 2 |
| T0G | 61,454 | 46 | 99 | 1391 | 7 |
| T9N | 285 | 10 | 97 | 193 | 0 |
| T0J | 37,637 | 55 | 91 | 719 | 4 |
| T1H | 39 | 14 | 89 | 129 | 0 |
| T9V | 187 | 10 | 85 | 192 | 0 |
| T0A | 36,759 | 49 | 80 | 247 | 3 |
| T0B | 30,127 | 59 | 80 | 581 | 2 |
| T0H | 222,929 | 169 | 77 | 386 | 9 |
| T0K | 24,910 | 61 | 77 | 602 | 10 |
| T0C | 18,267 | 19 | 76 | 389 | 3 |
| T8V | 56 | 28 | 75 | 253 | 2 |
| T1K | 274 | 18 | 73 | 212 | 1 |
| T7E | 8,054 | 19 | 73 | 344 | 4 |
| T9M | 481 | 18 | 70 | 193 | 0 |
| T0L | 28,135 | 37 | 69 | 367 | 3 |
| T0E | 31,996 | 56 | 65 | 280 | 9 |
| T1A | 1,585 | 18 | 65 | 156 | 0 |
| T8W | 332 | 16 | 63 | 247 | 1 |
| T4T | 7,240 | 19 | 62 | 161 | 0 |
| T1B | 3,971 | 23 | 60 | 131 | 0 |
| T9H | 23,261 | 26 | 50 | 168 | 0 |
| T7V | 4,516 | 18 | 36 | 826 | 1 |
| T9K | 39 | 35 | 33 | 151 | 0 |
25 districts have ten or more tested homes, which is where these figures start to mean something. The table shows those; 88 districts with thinner samples are on the map but not listed here. 41 districts have no measurement at all and are shaded on the map.
Nothing on this page describes your house. Radon varies enormously between homes on the same street, because it depends on how each building sits on and draws air from the ground beneath it. The highest reading here is 1,391 Bq/m³ and it sits in a district whose median is far below it. A long-term test in your own home is the only measurement that tells you anything about your home.
Also: the other city and province maps, and what radon actually is.
Sources and method. Radon measurements: Health Canada, Radon and Thoron Data From Canadian Homes (Calgary and Edmonton CMAs) pooled with the Cross-Canada Survey of Radon Concentrations in Homes 2009-2011, both under the Open Government Licence – Canada. Boundaries: Statistics Canada 2021 cartographic forward sortation area file, same licence. Percentages are calculated from the individual measurements shown, not quoted from a summary. Land areas are from the Statistics Canada boundary file.